$5 Gasoline? Really?

This week our fine President announced that he had no control over gas prices. It’s a strange position for him to take. Strange as in unusually laughable. This is the man who told us that energy costs would necessarily skyrocket while he supported Alternate forms of energy. This is the man who wanted to bankrupt the coal companies. This is the man who doesn’t want to drill in ANWR or off shore, but will buy up all the Brazilian oil they can produce from OUR off shore fields. Sadly, even this fine offer was turned down by Brazil, who signed contracts with China for their oil. I’m sure that our president has a vision of Solar powered Airliners flying freely through the skies with no pollution and wind powered tractor trailers crossing the highways beneath cloudless skies, not to mention the thousand of locomotives operating on Steam power. But alas, he can’t do anything about the price of Gasoline.

Let’s look at history for any available remedies to help our president out. First of all our president needs to realize that an Alternative fuel has been a political “Cause” since the early 1900’s. For an excellent analysis, I would refer the reader to this scholarly work http://www.radford.edu/wkovarik/papers/fuel.html
Henry Ford was a great proponent of Alcohol for fueling his automobiles. As late as 1936 an alcohol conversion kit was offered by Ford Motor Company. However, Congress harkened to the Department of Defense and decided to go with oil. This was the right decision at the time as Gasoline was selling at roughly 18 cents a gallonand Alcohol was selling at 38 cents. Frankly, the API was lobbying hard for it. Moving forward, Roosevelt put on price controls for wartime gasoline consumption and went to rationing. When Jimmy Carter was president, we had an oil shortage and the beginning of long lines at the gas pumps. The actual shortage was generally
thought of as “manufactured”. Living in Illinois, I experienced the long lines at the gas pumps and climbing gas prices. I also had a friend that worked for one of the local refineries of which there were three. One day a week, my friend would pick up my car and take it to work. He would then bring it back to me with a full tank. I thought that he may have been stealing from work. He told me no, the company had run out of storage space, so they were giving the gas to the employees and burning gasoline soaked barge rope along the banks of the river.

In the early 80’s, I worked for Halliburton in New Mexico. I worked on wells that produced oil in New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and California. I had been told from various oil company engineers that there was plenty of oil available for drilling for the next 200+ years. I had also been told that for years the oil companies had been drilling wells throughout the US and just capping the wells for future production. I actually got to work on putting a few of those wells into production. By 1983, gas prices had fallen to less than one dollar a gallon. It was at this time that Prudhoe Bay was opening up for production. There was one very memorable well I worked on. It was located on the West Mesa outside of Albuquerque. The deepest hole they had drilled in the US to that time. It was 29,500 feet deep. It was an exploratory well. We discovered 4 oil formations and 5 Natural Gas formations. One of the group of engineers that I worked with told me that we really didn’t need to import anyoil due to reserves that they knew about currently. He showed me a map of theUS and outlined with his finger 5 separate spots that we could work for the next 50 years each. He displayed a field north of the Permian basin in Texas, one that ran through Ohio, Michigan, and Northern Indiana, and told me about oil that had been seeping up through the ground where two runways crossed in Flora, IL. The Flora seepage, I had later confirmed in a Halliburton employee magazine that told of Halliburton getting called out to drill the hole to stop the seepage. This was during Reagan’s administration. Refining costs were 39 cents a gallon in New Mexico.

When President Clinton was in office, the price of oil was generally under $2 a gallon, even though we heard about OPEC shortening supply and oil was imported even more. The EPA was furthering its regulations on Drilling, Refining, and Storage Facilities. If a Refinery had a storage tank fire, EPA wouldn’t license a rebuild. Drilling had more regulations concerning concrete pits for overflow. Soil studies and samples for water retention and what kind of environmental impact the hole would make. It become harder for oil companies to produce gasoline. Exploration slowed to a virtual standstill. Price increase was exacerbated by oil companies looking for greater profits. This is displayed in quotations from a paper Senator Wyden published in 2000. Thiscan be read in its entirety here: http://wyden.senate.gov/issues/gas_prices/pdfs/wyden_oil_report.pdf
“a senior energy analyst at the recent API (American Petroleum Institute) convention warned
that if the U.S. petroleum industry doesn’t reduce its refining capacity, it will never see any substantial increase in refining margins…However, refining utilization has been rising, sustaining high levels of operations, thereby keeping prices low.”
Internal Chevron document, November 30, 1995

When President Bush took office in 2001, Gas prices were averaging $1.69/ Gallon. After 9/11 gas prices started the upward crawl. Oil companies were buying each other up for refining capacity. Independents were being swallowed up. EPA was still pushing intolerable regulations. When prices crawled to 3 dollars a gallon for gas, President Bush was asked by the press what he intended to do about the price of gasoline, he told the press that if the people thought they were being gouged by the oil companies, report them to the FTC. Within a week, prices started to go down at the pump. My belief is that if the FTC investigated the pricing, they would have learned that the oil companies were following the commodity price which is based on future demand
rather than lobbying for EPA relaxation of regulation.

Nowthat brings us back to our current President who openly wants high gas prices. What can the poor boy do to ease the suffering at the pump? Currently, we have 17M barrels of oil refining capacity. We consume 21 million barrels of oil. That’s a 4 million barrel deficit that we import oil to make up. We are drilling more now on private land, not public land. This doesn’t give us as taxpayers any royalty money or benefit from lease fees or taxes. This current state of affairs gives us plenty of oil, but not enough refining. Oil companies want to make profit so anything over that 17 Million Barrels can be easily exported for a nice profit. All extra drilling would accomplish would be to increase the amount of exported oil. More profit for the oil companies and higher
speculation in the markets. The taxes we pay to the Federal government would still be high, the taxes to the states would remain the same. The politicians would be asking to raise the taxes to promote some utopian situation and in then final Bills the contributors would gain millions. So what can a leader of the free world do? First we would need to find a leader. Then he could call the oil companies, the API and the department of the Interior, The Energy Czar, and the EPA head into a meeting. He could explain that the country does not want to impede the free market in any business; however we prefer to be self sufficient where our energy is concerned. He would strongly suggest that the EPA limits its licensing and approval process for refining and storage to six months and be generous in its approvals. To the oil companies, he could suggest that the
game is over and we need not just 21 Million Barrels of oil available But 30 million barrels of oil at the ready daily. Anything over that they could export. It is in the best interest of the economy, as well as the EPA and the Oil companies to satisfy the demand. Have it all completed within 5 years. Furthermore, get busy drilling on public land to help pay down the debt. This would lower the commodity speculation price, as we would not need imported oil and the main player in the oil market is buying locally. Let the Arabs sell the oil to China. If the EPA complains, he can replace the head with someone like minded. If the oil companies complain, maybe their licenses or tax forms could be reviewed for any improprieties. It is not a free market when the country is held hostage by the EPA and the oil companies. But again we would have to find that leader .

What I want in a President

With all the hullabaloo about the Republican Primary elections and delegates, I took the time to think about what I would want in a President. What I realized was that no one running for election right now fits the bill perfectly. I consider myself an independent voter, although I have
voted more times for Republican nominees more than Democrats, so I guess I’m not a “Straight ticket” type of guy. While I lived in Tennessee I voted for Phil Bredesen for Mayor. I was proved right. The greatest business increase for Nashville in the last 50 years can be attributed to Mayors Fulton and Bredesen. I moved back to IL in time to watch the Jack Ryan fiasco. I would have voted for Jack Ryan. But, David Axelrod Preferred to assassinate him publically, and instead of backing him, The IL Republicans preferred to drop him. Bad Choice on their part. We got State Senator “voting present” Obama.

What I see as I get older is how the people who are elected to represent us find more reasons to spend less time with us. I suppose the Georgetown political parties are more exciting. It seems that once they get elected they vote the way they want and want no accountability for it. The
Party seems more important than the people. Power seems more important than the constituents. The chasm seems to grow with each election. So I took the time to analyze why I voted for this one andnot that one. These are the qualities that I would want for the next president.
1. Knowing and abiding by the US Constitution. My belief is that the US Constitution is written in stone. It is not a living breathing thing; it is the rules of the entire nation. Something that we once all agreed on as the best way to be governed. I want him to understand what his position means along with the checks and balances to promote the best government for the people, not lobbying groups, party affiliations, Campaign contributors, and the like.
2. I would like my president to inspire the peopleto achievement rather than decide how they should live. I want him to understand that emotional outcry does not deserve legislative response. I want him to know that everyone is not a victim of the system, but a beneficiary of it. I do want him to discourage dependency on the Government and encourage personal achievement.
3. I want the president to know the law, but not be a lawyer. That is the job for the Attorney General. However, I don’t want the President to encourage laws that prioritize results based on race, gender, sexual orientation or any other discriminating reason. We are all American, we
are not born hyphenated.
4. I would like the President to have some military experience, preferably in a combat situation, to know what defending this country really means. It would also give him insight to the difference between controlling the people and leading them.
5. I would like the President to live by the law. When the constitution says defend against enemies both foreign and domestic, which includes Illegal aliens, gangbangers killing to make their bones and countries that hold our citizens hostage under phony charges.
6. I want the President to have been properly vetted in each state. I find it hard to believe that a President can seal all his personal life and still be electable. How can someone hide himself from the people he wants to lead? I would certainly like to see the next president set up an independent investigation into the current president’s eligibility to be president, and if he is found ineligible prosecute him and all those who aided and abetted him to the fullest extent of the law. Then I would want him to deal with the Constitutional crisis of unraveling every executive order and law that he signed.
7. I would like the President to be a man of some religious belief and understand that the people that he is leading are not just physical and emotional creatures, but also have a spirit that needs to be fed as well. This would change some current law as in abortion and the encroaching
Sharia Law as well as prayer in schools.

Upon further consideration, I suppose that person who I would want for president wouldn’t want to be president.

The new Congress is in place. The American People have spoken. The Libertarians want more personal freedom and less Government in our daily life. The Tea Party want smaller Government and less spending.The American People voted in the last election to say if you don't hear us, you won't get another chance. The Democrats say if the Government cuts spending, some of the Entitlement programs will have to be cut. In essence, Social Security, Student Loans, Medicare, etc. Interestingly enough, each one of these programs was sold to the American People to increase the money the Government has to spend more than to take care of citizens. This allowed the Representatives to increase their power and allowed them to interfere with more of the personal lives.

Social Security is supposed to be a voluntary program. I have yet to have an employer tell me that. Every year it has been "Sign this. and make any changes" Medicaid didn't really address the Medical concerns of the elderly and the impoverished. But the money is taken out of the paycheck. There is one funny part of this with the student loans. The loans pay for college education at a college that takes money from the Government for a number of programs, i e Grants for Research among them. at the same time teaching the students about the flaws in our governmental system and how our Constitution is a "Living document that needs to evolve with the times." I don't agree with that. I believe that our people in Government need to be accountable for their actions and decisions that affect its citizens. All the American people have for the standard for their performance is the Constitution.

Back to the elections, If we really want to limit the size and scope of Government, we need to look locally. if we can get our city and county Government to become less dependent on the State and Federal government. Likewise, the State needs to become less dependent on the Federal government. Therefore, the Federal Government needs less money to operate. Remember this, for every program the Government comes up with it includes new committees for oversight. It also includes four levels of Administration for the program and for every dollar spent, less than .25 cents gets to the end user. So before we can start cutting the spending, lets audit each Department in each level of Government and see exactly where we can spend the money more efficiently.

What to Do About Representatives That Aren’t Representing You

For at least the last 100 years, probably more, the representatives of each state, both Senators and Representatives alike, have been separating themselves from the reliance of the State and their constituency. If you are thinking that you are not properly being represented in Washington or your own State Capitol, odds are, that you are correct. In politics like elsewhere, the Golden Rule applies. He who has the gold, makes the rules.
The essence of political life is re-election. To extend their stay in Political Life, the politician must have campaign funds. The largest contributors have the ears of the Politician. The Politician is obliged to keep the coffers full. He/she become obligated to those contributors. They will use fund raising events, Pac’s, Internet Donations, fund raising consultants, party donations and well known party people to help them stump for not only the votes but also for the contribution. Now don’t blame the politician, this is the reality in current times. It takes truckloads of money to run a campaign for the state government. It takes boatloads of money to become a US Representative or Senator. Obama is said to have spent over 650 million dollars to run his election. This is how Lobbyists, Special Interest Groups, and Political Non Profits become so important. These people direct money to favorable candidates.
Once the politician gets elected, there are numerous benefits available to them paid for by the citizenry. Along with a sizeable salary, they receive money for office expenses, travel expenses, free mail, fact finding missions, healthcare, special consideration for the schooling of their children, etc. They also get to vote for their own pay raises.
If you don’t understand why they can’t hear you by now; think of it this way. We elect professional beggars to live a life of ultimate welfare. There are numerous campaign reform laws, all written by people who depend on campaign funding. I have some suggestions.
First and most important, become actively involved in the political process. Garner information on your Senators and Representatives, both in the State and the Federal levels. There is much information out there in the public domain. Collect it and connect the dots. Get a list of the contributors, Collect what bills they sponsor, how they voted on each bill, check on the government contracts and who are they awarded to. Did one of the major contributors get the contracts? Are there any no bid contracts awarded to one of the contributors? What lobbyists courted their vote? What special interest groups are trying to influence their vote? If you can get access to his staff and befriend them, it may take a while, but you can find out if they bend the laws to suit their own agenda. When you have information to share, start an e-letter or a blog. Put an ad out there for information for a book about the politician’s significance to the state or country. You will get glowing references and some not so glowing remarks. Remember to check the facts and have duplicate verifications, before you publish.
At the state level, you can work for a recall vote for your elected officials. This is your right. It might not be a law in your state, but it is the right of the citizenry to recall an official who they feel has abused public trust. No Lawmaker really wants a recall law. It will take enough petitioners to get it on the ballot. Make sure that the petition is inclusive of all elected Officials, State and Federal and Municipal to reclaim your right.
The Federal Level will be harder to get back. Here’s why. The state doesn’t pay those guys in Washington. All of the population does. Here are some suggestions, however. First, change the Campaign Finance Laws. This could be simply done, but it will be a fight. Let’s look at what they need money for. They will claim getting their message out. OK, I‘ll buy that. Let the FCC get involved. The FCC is in place to regulate the airwaves. The Airwaves or radio, and television signals are controlled by the FCC but are owned by the American People. It could be this simple. Each candidate gets one minute per hour, no more, no less. It would be free. The time allotted would be a 100% write off of the stations taxes.
The same could be done with the printed ads. No more than 4 or 6 Column inches in each publication per edition. They can’t buy any more, period.
Now what about the internet? We will get to that in a moment.
On the Federal level, there needs to be a complete revamp of compensation and campaign donations. First, limit the universe of contributors. Let’s look at how this can be done.
1. Eliminate Federal Matching funds.
2. Limit contributions to voters that will be in his constituency.
3. In cases of business, one corporation equals one legal entity or one vote.
4. No Foreign Contributions, including Native American Tribal Contributions (Something that John McCain kept in McCain-Feingold).
5. Only one Campaign donation collection fund. Not the multiple ones they have now. And it will be audited monthly for the contributors.
6. Corporate donations are allowed, however that corporation cannot be involved or awarded any Government contracts
7. If an industrial, labor, lobbying firm or other nonprofit group wishes to contribute to a candidate, they may, but that candidate can’t vote or debate any legislation that would affect the contributory group to avoid conflict of interest.
8. Before the candidate becomes a candidate, they must take a constitutional test to demonstrate their knowledge of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Now for compensation. We have to recover the idea that our representatives work for the people of the State that elected them. These are my suggestions.
1. End the Federal Retirement Program. Close it out. Whatever funds are in there give out to those members who put it there according to their contributions. Remove the ability to keep full pay for the rest of their lives for serving one term.
2. States would pay their reps directly. The States would decide when they would get a raise.
3. Let the states decide which trips the US reps should take and the perks they receive.
4. Appoint a separate Ethics Board at the State level for oversight. It would have to include former elected officials, at least one police officer Lieutenant or greater and regular citizens. This board would have the ability to Judge the Ethics violation and to recommend appropriate response including coordinating with States Attorneys for any criminal activity.
This would only be a beginning. All bills would have to be published both on line and in print in their legislative language for the public to voice the concerns of the constituency for a period of at least 30 days before either house could have a Final vote.
In the final analysis Our Representatives and Senators must learn that the position is not just to make law, but to resist encroaching Government from affecting the Constituency. Stay Vigilant.

Healthcare; some opinions

The Debate in the Nation about healthcare is confusing. I have spoken to many people about the healthcare Bill(s) proposed by our Congress and Senate. The Opinions are varied on the subject matter generally. There is some difficulty in defining exactly what kind of healthcare they think needs changing.
There are, to be sure, some people that feel the Federal Government needs to cover all people for everything. There are those who want insurance coverage for everyone, Illegal’s included. There are those that want the barriers to free market insurance changed. They speak of portability of coverage, arbitrary denial of coverage, variations in care depending on what kind of insurance the patient has, and the skyrocketing cost of healthcare overall coupled with less coverage, higher co pays, constantly changing physicians from the insurance companies list of Plan Providers. The Doctors would prefer cash or barter rather than wait and hope that the insurance company agrees to pay.
Let’s break down what is entailed in Healthcare. There is Preventative Healthcare which includes regular checkups, vaccinations, etc. This is like body maintenance and it includes not only physical, but also dental, optical, and mental.
There is the need healthcare which includes sickness, trauma, and sudden onset of everything, hospitalization and Major Medical.
There is also the alternative Healthcare which includes, holistic, Oriental, Natural, and Herbal. And we can’t forget witch doctors, Shamans, Voo Doo, psychic practitioners.
None of these cover elective procedures like tubal ligations, vasectomies, botox, breast implants, etc.
So tell me just what type of healthcare are you speaking of?
The Government does bear some responsibility in the current situation. After all, Legislation brought about the HMO, EPO, PPO, etc. The Constitution doesn’t include healthcare as a God given right. I would let the Government handle healthcare if they could just cure the common cold. Instead, they have Medicare, Medicaid, and the VA. Now, they want to play insurance company.
I would venture this option. Our Federal Government Passes this into Legislation. The Trial attorneys who went after Big Tobacco go after the new legislation in each area of the healthcare proposal. One test case after another until the Supreme Court Rules the entire thing unconstitutional. At the same time, as soon as this is passed, each of the 50 States invokes States rights and says no way to the Feds. This will give the general population time to decide exactly who and what changes need to be addressed immediately. My feeling is this. Use Cash for Maintenance healthcare, pay for Major Medical Coverage with no limits on what is covered and for how long (Catastrophic Medical needs). This would lessen the impact of the insurance companies on the overall cost. Public health could grow a bit and handle the maintenance issues. If the Federal Government really wants to spend 900 Billion on Healthcare issues, let them put a tax free $10Million award to the person or persons who find a cure for Cancer, Diabetes, Heart disease, MS, etc. This will let the free market fight it out and reduce the amount of healthcare overall.

American Rights

Most American citizens understand that our Constitution includes a Bill of Rights. However, all too often the populous knows the 10:00 News version of what they say. I would like to explain them now before I proceed Amendment 1. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. This particular amendment may be somewhat confusing to the population; specifically because of how often we hear it and how often it’s misquoted. Let’s break it down. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. Congress (where laws come from) can’t start a new religion. Neither can the Executive Branch, Nor the Judiciary. or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. So, if I read this correctly and it’s only a few words in English Congress can’t enact a law to prohibit religion and neither can The President (covering religious images before he speaks) or the Judiciary (redefining existing law to promote a different agenda). or abridging the freedom of speech These few words tend to negate the whole concept of Politically Correct. Or of the press The MSM can spin it however they want. Time to teach critical thought. or the right of the people peaceably to assemble I guess this means that our Founding Fathers appreciated Lively public Discourse. And make sure your Representative understands this part. When they call a Town Hall meeting, they can’t arbitrarily limit the scope or the Size of the gathering. It is funny in a way, that there is no limit as to the size crowd in attendance for one of their fund raisers. petition the Government for a redress of grievances Does this mean that the Federal Court can’t refuse to hear a case against the government? Amendment 2 A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This amendment allows for the States to have a National Guard (Militia) a Volunteer Army, if you will. I don’t believe that all the current groups calling themselves a militia today wouldu pass the well regulated part. This also allows for the Governor of a state to utilize the Guard to preserve the security of the state. This would include natural disaster, cleaning out gangs or illegal aliens, and fighting against domestic invasion. This also negates gun bans, denial of gun collections of any amount, caliber, and type, or any age discrimination for ownership. Amendment 3. No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. This is self explanatory. Amendment 4 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. This amendment says that the Government cannot search or seize property or person without Probable Cause that is attested to. Amendment 5 No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. This is the famous Fifth amendment It clearly states that a person cannot face an accusation for a Capital crime without an indictment by a Grand Jury. It also guarantees that a person does not have to incriminate himself with his testimony. It guarantees legal due process in court to each accused person.This is also the Famous Double Jeopardy Right, which has been distorted into the Hate Crime Law. And last, The right of Eminent Domain to all jurisdictional authorities is stated. The benefit to the citizenry is the just compensation for that property involved. Amendment 6 In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense . This guarantees the right to a speedy trial, attended by a jury of your peers, Legal cousel, and Discovery of the accusation and the evidence against the citizen. Amendment 7 In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. This guarantees the right to a jury trial even in Civil Trials Amendment 8 Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. You all know what this means, the Courts cannot arbitrarily make an example out of the accused or the guilty. Amendment 9 The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. We have other rights? Yes, we do. They are not emotional hopefuls like clean air or water. But, they are rights just the same. We will discover these later. Amendment 10 The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. This guarantees that more powers (rights) are available to the citizenry and allows the decentralization of the Government.

What Are the True Rights of Americans?

If you haven't read the US Constitution or the Bill of Rights, lately, do so. After you learn this, lets look at other rights. Our form of Government is called Representative Republic. This is because the government body itself is to be representative of the peoples governed. How do we get that representation? We vote them in. We elect them to represent us. But they want us to believe that even though they work for us, they are the ones that can decide if they stay in office. Wrong!! The Electorate has the right to remove the elected from office. Is it written in the Constitution? No. Is it written in the Bill of rights? NO. Why? It was understood that the electorate would police the performanceof the elected. We Don't. It became obvious in the State of Illinois lately, when the legislature voted to allow a recall vote for the office of Governor. It didn't allow the people to recall the other elected officials. Why was that? 4 out of 5 of the last Illinois Governors were convicted of malfeasance. But they didn't do it by themselves. The rest of the elected officials don't want to live with that over their heads. They might be unelected for Patronage jobs, tax increases, pay raises for themselves or even vote fraud to get elected. This isn't a Republican or Democrat thing, It's a Populus thing. One of the things that have been taken from you over the years and has become accepted practice. This is a States Rights Issue. There are States that have this written in their laws to protect the population from the largesse of self serving elected officials. I also believe that this applies all the way to the President of the US.

Lets explore another right. Unwritten to be sure, but none the less important...and none the less the right of the Americans. You do have the right to read the Legislative language of any Bill before its passed. The current President spoke of 5 days to see the Bill. However, the Bill of Rights is written in simple language, in short easily understandable English so the People could understand was was being voted on by their representatives and have time to respond. Do you feel like your representatives is listening to you? Demand that the Bill's Legislative language be published where you can access it and demand a suitable time to discuss it with your representatives . Our representative form of government was set up for this reason. So that no one from another State could push through a law that could adversely affect you or your state. Do you feel like that is why your representative wants public office? If you look at it Elected officials have the highest form of Welfare in the country. The US Representatives give themselves raises whenever, and often do it late at night. They alsohave granted themselves a lifetime Retirement at Full pay for only one term. Tell your boss you would like the same. Don't be surprised if he laughs you out of his office. Take it back. Keep following this blog, there will be more to come.